1.8 KiB
1.8 KiB
Report Format
Use these output shapes when reporting agent-docs findings. Keep the format compact, but preserve the field order so audits and follow-up refactors stay easy to compare.
Audit Finding
- <severity>: <short finding title>
observed fact: <what was directly verified in the docs, references, or command output>
inference: <why this creates adherence risk or maintenance risk>
impact: <what the agent or maintainer is likely to get wrong>
Consistency Finding
- <severity>: <short finding title>
structural evidence: <cycle, reachability gap, overlap signal, depth budget overrun, or secondary-router signal>
refactor needed: <yes / no / maybe>
note: <why the current structure is acceptable or why it should change>
Repo-Alignment Finding
- <result>: <short finding title>
doc claim: <the wording from AGENTS.md or agent-docs>
observed repo fact: <the file, command, or code area that confirms or contradicts the claim>
severity: <omit when result is confirmed; otherwise blocking / major / minor / observation>
Verification Summary
- result level: <fully verified / structurally verified only / behavior check failed / verification incomplete>
commands: <the commands run in the current turn>
representative behavior checks: <performed / not performed / not required>
unverified remainder: <anything still not checked>
residual findings: <severity-labeled items that still remain after verification>
Format Rules
- Keep findings first.
- Use the shared severity model when a severity is required.
- Keep
observed fact,structural evidence, andobserved repo factgrounded in files or command output from the current turn. - Do not skip the required fields just because there is only one finding.